The topic I have chosen for my research
paper is child development. I was initially
drawn to this topic through my sociology class.
The studies presented were intriguing, and I plan to use this material
as supporting evidence for my paper. Obviously,
ever child born must develop into an adult, granted a premature death does not
occur. Children, at birth, are “blank
slates.” They are brought into this
world without any prior influence. The
later influences, particularly that of the family, shape and mold a child to
hold the beliefs, values, and norms he or she will carry for the rest of his or
her life. When the topic of child
development surfaces, the age-old question of nature versus nurture comes into
play. After completing some starter
research and using the knowledge I have gained, it became obvious that the
nurture outweighs the nature of the child as far as the resulting adult. Put more simply, the nature of the child does
not play as heavy a role as the nurture of the childhood when developing in the
early stages of life.
As
stated, my sociology class sparked my desire to find out more information on
the development of children into functioning adults. My sociology book is a very reliable print
source. It is filled with vital
information, including an introduction of sociologist Piaget’s methodology on
the four phases of childhood development.
Curious to know more, I consulted the internet and gained access to an
article on the studies implemented by Piaget.
These two sources, I believe, are a firm foundation and great place to
start my in depth research. My third source
is youtube footage of a study done on a girl who, through horrid neglect from
her family, experienced no interaction with people from the time she was born
until she was thirteen. This supports my
thesis in showing that a lack of human encounters and positive communication
leads to a child without any sort of social mannerisms, as well as a deficit
set of human like qualities. The footage
is astounding. It will act as not only a
reference for information, but as the still-images required to fulfill the
visual rhetoric aspect of the project.
The fourth source I have listed as of now is a print article by Annette
Lareau. She studied the differentiating
circumstances of children growing up within different income classes. Lareau reported the characteristics of
children as they became adults, and how this is an aftermath of the choice in
childrearing.
Potential
problems I might encounter while completing this project are also quite
numerable. The most obvious argument is
that the actual genetic nature of a child has more of an impact rather than the
way he or she is raised. That opposing
argument comes with a plethora of sub-arguments that could very easily find
holes in the one that I am presenting. I
plan to present both perspectives on my thesis.
My research paper will introduce the understanding that nature is more important
as well as the understanding that nurture is more important. The majority of my project, though, will
argue why and how childrearing is so much more influential and what sort of
impact is has on the child as he or she becomes an adult.
Summers, You point this out in your "problem" paragraph, but make sure that this issue has multiple perspectives-it's not just about either one or the other. Also, as you compile your research, you'll begin to make connections and form a strong argument.
ReplyDelete